|
I1(MM) |
= |
.12 – I107(MM) mrk ST114 [21 dr.c.] |
: |
imq .11 – I64(MKW) mrk B181(MKR) [22 dr.c.] |
: |
|
|
|
|
.08 – I82(TR) mrk B10(TR) [16 dr.c.] |
: |
.05 – I51(TR) bal NO61(TR) [19 dr.c.] |
: |
|
|
|
|
.03 – I147(TR) bal B153(TR) [12 dr.c.] |
: |
.01 – I43(TR) bal B92(TR) [12 dr.c.] |
: |
|
|
|
|
.99 – I105(TR) ins B129(TR) [8 dr.c.] |
: |
.97 – I2(TR) lgn B173(TR) |
: |
|
|
|
|
.96 – I49(TR) lgn B169(TR) |
: |
.94 – I51(TR) aml B137(TR) |
: |
|
|
imq .93 – Takab93aR × TakabM (pure meda (Iran)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unauthorized reproduction of this picture, whole or part, is forbidden, except for personal use. |
|
|
Evaluation of I1(MM) done in 2012 & 2013 & 2014
Eval. |
Vitality of |
Temper |
Swarming |
Ferti- |
Crop |
Overwin- |
Building |
Varroa |
HYG+ |
year |
bees |
brood |
of bees |
tendency |
lity |
Early |
Summ. |
tering |
Combs |
Propol. |
number |
VSH+ |
after 24 h |
2012 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
- |
- |
2013 |
5 |
4.5 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
- |
73% |
2014 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
- |
80 % |
Evaluation scale: from 1 to 6. 1 = very bad. 3 = bad average. 4 = good average.
5 = great performance. 6 = optimum exceptional looked for in this feature.
[ more ]
|
|